Labor Vector
Labor Vector meta-aggregator / AI governing labor

Worker Info Exchange

AI governing laborWorker powernon-profit organisationactive
Worker Info Exchange: a non-profit organisation: data access requests, data investigations, data trusts and strategic litigation for gig workers. Operator: Worker Info Exchange, a non-profit in London (Director James Farrar; Research Lead Cansu Safak, as the foundation's post of 29 April 2026 names them); the Uber collective action is brought by Stichting WIE International, a Dutch foundation working in cooperation with Worker Info Exchange, and the foundation's post describes WIE as coordinating it. Its unit: a subject access or data portability request made on behalf of a worker; also a targeted data investigation or report. Whose labor: the work of gig economy workers managed by algorithms (Uber drivers in the UK and Europe named in its news; its reports include a Just Eat Report and a McMisery Report).
Visit Worker Info Exchange ↗The /non rowThe DSL audit
Worker Info Exchange is a non-profit helping workers reclaim control over the data collected from them at work. We help workers turn data into power — challenging unfair algorithmic systems and holding tech platforms to account.

In its own words: https://www.workerinfoexchange.org/, read 2026-10-29

Who supplies, who directs, who gains

Supplies the laborgig economy workers, as the sources say, Uber drivers among them
Directs ittech platforms through opaque automated management systems (hidden algorithms) that allocate work, determine pay and assess performance
Receives the gains, bears the costsit names algorithmic wage cuts and damages drivers have suffered from Uber's dynamic pay system; the foundation states Uber's commission was set at 25% before dynamic pay, and that under dynamic pay Uber takes nearly half of the fare in some cases and keeps more than half of the fare in many cases; the Oxford and Worker Info Exchange analysis found drivers' real pay declined while Uber's profit margins rose sharply

Each as the resource itself records it. Where it records nothing, the census says so.

What it records

IntersectionsAI governing labor: hiring, surveillance, scheduling, quotas, evaluation and discipline; Worker power: bargaining, organizing, consent, refusal, contestation and enforceable protections; Distribution of gains and losses: wages, employment, workload, credit, ownership, and who captures productivity gains
Kind of evidencedata accessorganizing resource
Unit of recorda subject access or data portability request made on behalf of a worker; also a targeted data investigation or report op
Whose laborthe work of gig economy workers managed by algorithms (Uber drivers in the UK and Europe named in its news; its reports include a Just Eat Report and a McMisery Report)
Methodsubject access and data portability requests under data protection law, targeted data investigations and analyses, strategic litigation, and aggregation of workers' data through data trusts op
Coveragegeography: London-based; UK and Europe; the Uber action focuses on drivers from the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland, Romania and the United Kingdom; period: founded 2020; news items from March 2025 onward on the saved home page (earlier pages not read); the Oxford and WIE analysis covers Uber trips from 2016 to 2024
What it findsjoint analysis by Oxford University and WIE of 1.5 million Uber trips between 2016 and 2024 found that after the introduction of dynamic pricing in 2023 drivers' real pay declined, volatility increased, and Uber's profit margins rose sharply; the foundation states Uber's commission was 25% before dynamic pay and nearly half of the fare in some cases after it; two drivers performing identical trips can be paid vastly different amounts, with Uber keeping more than half of the fare in many cases; news titles report falling pay and soaring commission fees for Liverpool Uber drivers as AI-controlled dynamic pay takes hold
Its stated limitsnone stated in the saved sources

op the resource's own statement · 3p a third-party account · obs our observation · rd our reading. Hover a tag for its quote; each opens below with its source.

What this evidence can settle

Can answer

  • what data a platform holds and uses about an individual worker, as returned to a request
  • how a platform's algorithm allocated work, set pay and assessed performance for the workers whose data was obtained

Cannot answer

  • platform-wide pay or dismissal rates beyond the workers whose data is aggregated
  • the outcome of the Uber collective action (pending in the saved sources)

In the worked questions

Where it meets Labor Vector

rd none stated. The archive reads WIE's data access as recovering, from the worker's side, the record of how an algorithm directed the work (allocation, pay, performance), the directionality question asked of the system that directs labor.

Entity

Canonical nameWorker Info Exchange
Also known asWIE, Stichting WIE International
Addresshttps://www.workerinfoexchange.org/
OperatorWorker Info Exchange, a non-profit in London (Director James Farrar; Research Lead Cansu Safak, as the foundation's post of 29 April 2026 names them); the Uber collective action is brought by Stichting WIE International, a Dutch foundation working in cooperation with Worker Info Exchange, and the foundation's post describes WIE as coordinating it
Founded2020 op
Kindnon-profit organisation: data access requests, data investigations, data trusts and strategic litigation for gig workers
Lifecycleactive — founded 2020; a collective action against Uber over dynamic pay launched by Stichting WIE International under the Dutch WAMCA collective procedure, in the Dutch courts, for drivers from seven countries who drove for Uber after November 2020, coordinated by WIE through its Dynamic Pay campaign (the foundation's post of 29 April 2026); latest news item on the home page dated Jul 23 (year not shown, listed above a 20 November 2025 item)
Countnot stated in the saved sources (as of 2026-10-29)
Data accessrequests made on behalf of workers (the Request Data page); the data returned belongs to the workers and is not published as a dataset in the saved sources
Licencenot stated in the saved sources
Versions and datessite copyright: 2025; news latest dated: 2025-11-20 (a later item dated Jul 23 carries no year); foundation post: 2026-04-29; foundation site copyright: 2026; read: 2026-10-29
Observation2026-10-29: read

Relations

Captures: the composition layer's account

The /non row

Evidenceevery field's quote, its source and the hash of the saved copy27
Negative tagswhat it is not3
  • NOT a union: it supports trade unions and grassroots worker organisations
  • NOT a public dataset of platform data
  • NOT the platforms' own transparency reporting
Sourcesevery source read, with its date and hash4
Not yet checkedwhat remains to read4
  • the research reports (Managed by Bots, Just Eat, McMisery, Dying for Data, Workers' Recommendations on EU Directive)
  • the Board, Team, Funding and Manifesto pages
  • the news and blog posts themselves
  • the Request Data page

Cite this record

Lee Sharks, ed. "Worker Info Exchange." Labor Vector meta-aggregator, laborvector.org, compiled 2026-10-29. https://www.laborvector.org/aggregators/worker-info-exchange

Record https://www.laborvector.org/aggregators/worker-info-exchange · entity https://www.laborvector.org/aggregators/worker-info-exchange#entity · the census as data

@misc{lv-workerinfoexchange2026,
  editor = {Sharks, Lee},
  title = {Worker Info Exchange},
  howpublished = {Labor Vector meta-aggregator, laborvector.org},
  year = {2026},
  note = {Compiled 2026-10-29; every field sourced and dated},
  url = {https://www.laborvector.org/aggregators/worker-info-exchange}
}
Editor: Lee Sharks (ORCID 0009-0000-1599-0703). This page is the Labor Vector meta-aggregator's record of the resource above: its reading and fields are ours, and each field carries its source, its basis and the hash of the copy read. The resource's own terms and findings are kept as its own. Compiled 2026-10-29. CC BY 4.0.